Nokia C32 vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 37/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X500 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C32 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C32
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Nokia C32 better?
- Overall rating 37/100
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 53 points higher (90/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | — | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 13145 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $970 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C32
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (94/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (87/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (81/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 by 53 points (90/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.