Nokia C32 vs Vivo X300s
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 37/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Nokia C32 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C32
Vivo X300s
What makes Nokia C32 better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 217g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 52 points higher (89/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C32
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (94/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (94/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (83/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 by 52 points (89/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Vivo X300s?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.