Nokia C32 vs Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1, while the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) leads — 30/100 vs 16/100 (a 14-point difference).
Nokia C32
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Overall rating 16/100
- Faster charging: 44W vs 10W
- Lighter: 188g vs 199g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India), the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) scores 14 points higher (30/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the Nokia C32 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A1 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 163.2×75.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 188 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the Nokia C32 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is noticeably better than the Nokia C32 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) — 30/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a better fit for everyday use.