Nokia C32 vs Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads — 33/100 vs 16/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia C32 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is noticeably lighter (175g vs 199g).
Nokia C32
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Overall rating 16/100
- Faster charging: 66W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 175g vs 199g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro scores 17 points higher (33/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the Nokia C32 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A1 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 175 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the Nokia C32 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (81/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is noticeably better than the Nokia C32 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.