Nokia C32 vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 31/100 vs 16/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000).
Nokia C32
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Lighter: 199g vs 203g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 46/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 10W
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 15 points higher (31/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Nokia C32 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A1 | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 203 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Nokia C32 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is noticeably better than the Nokia C32 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.