Nokia C32 vs Vivo iQOO Z7
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads — 26/100 vs 16/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia C32 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo iQOO Z7 is noticeably lighter (173g vs 199g).
Nokia C32
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 30/100)
- Faster charging: 44W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 173g vs 199g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (83/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Vivo iQOO Z7, the Vivo iQOO Z7 scores 10 points higher (26/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (36/100 vs 30/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (83/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Vivo iQOO Z7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A1 | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 173 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (36/100 vs 30/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (83/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 is noticeably better than the Nokia C32 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z7 is a better fit for everyday use.