Nokia C32 vs Samsung Galaxy S26+
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads — 70/100 vs 37/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia C32 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C32 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is thinner (7.3mm vs 8.6mm).
Nokia C32
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
- Overall rating 37/100
- Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Better camera (40/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 53/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ scores 33 points higher (70/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (40/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (72/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Samsung Galaxy S26+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3161830 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 2900 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9200 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Nokia C32
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (89/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (72/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 by 33 points (70/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on camera score (40/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.