Honor Win RT vs ZTE Blade A35
The Honor Win RT (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win RT leads — 76/100 vs 36/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win RT has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Honor Win RT has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A35 doesn't.
Honor Win RT
ZTE Blade A35
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (45/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (46/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Honor Win RT vs the ZTE Blade A35, the Honor Win RT scores 40 points higher (76/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Win RT leads (45/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT leads (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (45/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A35 is a bit better (46/100 vs 38/100).
| Specification | Honor Win RT | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 3475149 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1272x2800 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×76.6×8.3 mm | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | — | |
| Launch price | $384 | — |
Honor Win RT
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Honor Win RT
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2800
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor Win RT
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Blade A35
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (94/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (45/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A35 is a bit better (46/100 vs 38/100).
Which is better: the Honor Win RT or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 by 40 points (76/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Win RT and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Win RT has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win RT or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Win RT leads on camera score (45/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win RT over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Win RT is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A35 is a better fit for everyday use.