Nokia C32 vs ZTE Axon 41 5G
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the ZTE Axon 41 5G (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 41 5G leads — 56/100 vs 37/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 41 5G has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C32 doesn't.
Nokia C32
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Lighter: 199g vs 203g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 41/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (51/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (67/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the ZTE Axon 41 5G, the ZTE Axon 41 5G scores 19 points higher (56/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G leads (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (67/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 41/100).
| Specification | Nokia C32 | ZTE Axon 41 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 163.9×76.2×9.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (67/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (51/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 41/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G is noticeably better than the Nokia C32 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the ZTE Axon 41 5G — 56/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G leads on camera score (51/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 41 5G is a better fit for active users.