Nokia C32 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads — 71/100 vs 37/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia C32 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C32 doesn't; the Nokia C32 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).
Nokia C32
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 199g vs 215g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 44/100)
- Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
- Better camera (50/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 scores 34 points higher (71/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (79/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3382020 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1999 |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Nokia C32
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (79/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (50/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 by 34 points (71/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.