Nokia C300 vs OPPO Reno16 Pro

The Nokia C300 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 24/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 320,666); the OPPO Reno16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C300 doesn't.

The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 59 points (83/100 vs 24/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nokia C300

Performance 24
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 22
Portability 59
Value for money —

OPPO Reno16 Pro

Performance 82
Display 95
Camera 94
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 80

What makes Nokia C300 better?


  • Overall rating 24/100

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 320666
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 345
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 1065
  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
  • Lighter: 188g vs 190g

  • Higher performance (82/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 59/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C300 vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 59 points higher (83/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (82/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (95/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (66/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 59/100).

OPPO Reno16 Pro: The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nokia C300 OPPO Reno16 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
AnTuTu 320666 3079298
Geekbench Single 345 1555
Geekbench Multi 1065 6405
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.3" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1216x2640
Refresh rate — 144 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 6700 mAh
Charging 10W 80W
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 50 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 400 nits 3600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP69
Dimensions 166.7×76.6×8.6 mm 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm
Weight 190 g 188 g
Launch price — $600

Camera comparison

Nokia C300

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Nokia C300

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
95
display

Battery and charging

Nokia C300

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C300 and OPPO Reno16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
24/100
320666 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
83/100 +89.6%
3079298 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Nokia C300 by 89.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nokia C300

Price unknown

OPPO Reno16 Pro

$600

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (82/100 vs 24/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (95/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (94/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (66/100 vs 22/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 59/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nokia C300 or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 59 points (83/100 vs 24/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C300 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The Nokia C300 has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro — 83/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C300 or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C300 or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 24/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C300 over the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.