Nokia C200 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nokia C200 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 21/100 (a 70-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 155,362); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C200 doesn't; the Nokia C200 is noticeably lighter (172g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C200
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Nokia C200 better?
- Lighter: 172g vs 230g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C200 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 70 points higher (91/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (89/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C200 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C200 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.1" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.5×73.1×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 172 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C200
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nokia C200
- 6.1" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C200
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia C200 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia C200 by 96.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C200
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (99/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (89/100 vs 40/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (85/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C200 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C200 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 by 70 points (91/100 vs 21/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C200 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nokia C200 has a MobileRank rating of 21/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C200 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C200 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C200 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.