Nokia C2 Tava vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nokia C2 Tava (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 17/100 (a 74-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 155,362); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C2 Tava doesn't; the Nokia C2 Tava is noticeably lighter (180g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C2 Tava
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Nokia C2 Tava better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 230g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C2 Tava vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 74 points higher (91/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (89/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (85/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 Tava notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C2 Tava | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 11047 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 150.6×72.4×9.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C2 Tava
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nokia C2 Tava
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C2 Tava
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia C2 Tava and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia C2 Tava by 96.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C2 Tava
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (99/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (89/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (85/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 Tava notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C2 Tava or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava by 74 points (91/100 vs 17/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C2 Tava and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nokia C2 Tava has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C2 Tava or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C2 Tava or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C2 Tava over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.