Nokia C12 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nokia C12 Pro (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 25/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C12 Pro doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C12 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Nokia C12 Pro better?
- Overall rating 25/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 40/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C12 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 66 points higher (91/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (89/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Nokia C12 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C12 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.6×74.3×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C12 Pro
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nokia C12 Pro
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C12 Pro
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C12 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (89/100 vs 40/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (85/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Nokia C12 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C12 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro by 66 points (91/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C12 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nokia C12 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C12 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C12 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.