Nokia C12 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nokia C12 Pro (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 25/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C12 Pro doesn't.
Nokia C12 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Overall rating 25/100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 40/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Nokia C12 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 66 points higher (91/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (89/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Nokia C12 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
| Specification | Nokia C12 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.3" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.6×74.3×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Nokia C12 Pro
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C12 Pro
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C12 Pro
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Nokia C12 Pro
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (89/100 vs 40/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (85/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Nokia C12 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C12 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro by 66 points (91/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C12 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nokia C12 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C12 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C12 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nokia C12 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.