Nokia 7 Plus vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Nokia 7 Plus (2018) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $399 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 26/100 (a 65-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 347,995); the Nokia 7 Plus is noticeably lighter (183g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus by 65 points (91/100 vs 26/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 7 Plus
Performance 25
Display 43
Camera 18
Battery 18
Portability 69
Value for money 0
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Nokia 7 Plus better?
  • Lighter: 183g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $950

  • Better portability (69/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 347995
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 360
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1115
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 18/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 18/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 7 Plus vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 65 points higher (91/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 18/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 18/100). Value score: Nokia 7 Plus — 0/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus (99/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus (96/100 vs 18/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus (85/100 vs 18/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 7 Plus significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (69/100 vs 39/100).

Nokia 7 Plus: The Nokia 7 Plus is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 7 Plus Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 347995 4247433
Geekbench Single 360 3640
Geekbench Multi 1115 11033
Display 6.0" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2160x1080 3168x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3800 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 13 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 8.0 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 158.4×75.6×8.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 183 g 230 g
Launch price $399 $950
Camera comparison
Nokia 7 Plus
  • Main: 12MP f/1.75
  • Telephoto: 13MP
  • Front: 16MP
18
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 7 Plus
  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2160x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
43
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 7 Plus
  • 3800 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
18
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 7 Plus and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
26/100
347995 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +91.8%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia 7 Plus by 91.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 7 Plus
$399
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $551. Nokia 7 Plus was $551 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus (99/100 vs 25/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus (89/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus (96/100 vs 18/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus (85/100 vs 18/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia 7 Plus significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (69/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 7 Plus or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 7 Plus by 65 points (91/100 vs 26/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia 7 Plus and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia 7 Plus has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 7 Plus or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 18/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia 7 Plus or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 25/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 7 Plus over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia 7 Plus is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.