Nokia 4.2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nokia 4.2 (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $169 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 18/100 (a 73-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 193,115); the Nokia 4.2 is noticeably lighter (161g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 4.2
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Nokia 4.2 better?
- Lighter: 161g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $169 vs $950
- Better portability (78/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 193115
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 199
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 795
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 12/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia 4.2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 73 points higher (91/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Nokia 4.2 — 6/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (99/100 vs 12/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (89/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 4.2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 4.2 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 193115 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 199 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 795 | 11047 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1520x720 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 5W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB / 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 149.0×71.3×8.4 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 161 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $169 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Nokia 4.2
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nokia 4.2
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1520x720
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia 4.2
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia 4.2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia 4.2 by 95.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $781. Nokia 4.2 was $781 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (99/100 vs 12/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (89/100 vs 34/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (85/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 4.2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 4.2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 by 73 points (91/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 4.2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nokia 4.2 has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 4.2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 4.2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 12/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 4.2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.