Nokia 4.2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Nokia 4.2 (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $169 and $10498. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 18/100 (a 73-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 193,115); the Nokia 4.2 is noticeably lighter (161g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 by 73 points (91/100 vs 18/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 4.2
Performance 12
Display 34
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 78
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 86
What makes Nokia 4.2 better?
  • Lighter: 161g vs 230g
  • Cheaper: $169 vs $10498

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 193115
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 199
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 795
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 5W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 4.2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 73 points higher (91/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (99/100 vs 12/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (89/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 4.2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).

Nokia 4.2: The Nokia 4.2 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 4.2 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 193115 4247433
Geekbench Single 199 3640
Geekbench Multi 795 11033
Display 5.7" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1520x720 3168x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 5W 100W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 16GB / 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 149.0×71.3×8.4 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 161 g 230 g
Price $169 $10498
Camera comparison
Nokia 4.2
  • Main: 13MP f/2.2
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 4.2
  • 5.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1520x720
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
34
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 4.2
  • 3000 mAh
  • Wired: 5W
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 4.2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
18/100
193115 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +95.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia 4.2 by 95.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia 4.2
$169
Vivo X300 Ultra
$10498

Price difference: $10329. Nokia 4.2 is cheaper by $10329.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (99/100 vs 12/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (89/100 vs 34/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (85/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia 4.2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 4.2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 by 73 points (91/100 vs 18/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia 4.2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia 4.2 has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 4.2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia 4.2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 12/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 4.2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia 4.2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.