Nokia 2.3 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Nokia 2.3 (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 20/100 (a 71-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 155,362); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia 2.3 doesn't; the Nokia 2.3 is noticeably lighter (183g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 by 71 points (91/100 vs 20/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 2.3
Performance 10
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 32
Portability 61
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Nokia 2.3 better?
  • Lighter: 183g vs 230g

  • Better portability (61/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 155362
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 300
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 486
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 2.3 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 71 points higher (91/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 2.3 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (61/100 vs 39/100).

Nokia 2.3: The Nokia 2.3 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 2.3 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio A22 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 155362 4247433
Geekbench Single 300 3640
Geekbench Multi 486 11033
Display 6.2" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1520 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 5 MP 32 MP
RAM 2GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10; Android One Android 16
NFC no yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 157.7×75.4×8.7 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 183 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Nokia 2.3
  • Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 2.3
  • 6.2" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1520
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 2.3
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
32
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 2.3 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 2.3 MediaTek Helio A22
20/100
155362 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +96.3%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia 2.3 by 96.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 2.3
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (99/100 vs 10/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (89/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (85/100 vs 32/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia 2.3 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (61/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 2.3 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.3 by 71 points (91/100 vs 20/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia 2.3 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia 2.3 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 2.3 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia 2.3 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 10/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 2.3 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia 2.3 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.