Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Vivo Y500 Pro
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y500 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400; launch prices were $1499 and $220. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 63/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y500 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 953,150).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Vivo Y500 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 953150
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3185
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 60/100)
What makes Vivo Y500 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $220 vs $1499
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Vivo Y500 Pro, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 15 points higher (78/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 Pro leads (82/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Vivo Y500 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 Pro (92/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (82/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Vivo Y500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 953150 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3185 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $220 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y500 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo Y500 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo Y500 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Vivo Y500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Vivo Y500 Pro by 254.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1279. Vivo Y500 Pro was $1279 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 Pro (92/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (82/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo Y500 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y500 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo Y500 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo Y500 Pro — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo Y500 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo Y500 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Vivo Y500 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo Y500 Pro is a better fit for those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.