Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $1499 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 48/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 12 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 1,135,878); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 271g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 1135878
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3537
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 10W
- Lighter: 199g vs 271g
- Cheaper at launch: $1499 vs $1799
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 20/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 better?
- Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 30 points higher (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 38/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 4/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (95/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (60/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (64/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (68/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 1135878 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1500 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3537 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2208x1768 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 10W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 271 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- Main: 12MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2208x1768
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 10W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 197.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $300. Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 was $300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (92/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (95/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (60/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (64/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (68/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 30 points (78/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users.