Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy A17
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $1499 and $147. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 46/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 602,971).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy A17
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 602971
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 67/100)
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Cheaper: $147 vs $1499
- Better portability (70/100 vs 68/100)
- Better value for money (68/100 vs 62/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy A17, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 32 points higher (78/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (93/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (95/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (64/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is a bit better (68/100 vs 62/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 602971 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2047 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $1499 | $147 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A17
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy A17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy A17 by 460.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1352. Samsung Galaxy A17 is cheaper by $1352.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (93/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (95/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (60/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (64/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is a bit better (68/100 vs 62/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 by 32 points (78/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A17 is a better fit for everyday use.