Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Poco X3 NFC

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Poco X3 NFC (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G; launch prices were $1499 and $230. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 47/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Poco X3 NFC has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 526,647); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Poco X3 NFC by 31 points (78/100 vs 47/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Performance 93
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 62
Poco X3 NFC
Performance 42
Display 66
Camera 46
Battery 49
Portability 35
Value for money 50
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 526647
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 753
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1808
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 33W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 215g

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 46/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Poco X3 NFC better?
  • Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $1499

  • Overall rating 47/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Poco X3 NFC, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 31 points higher (78/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 49/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Poco X3 NFC — 50/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Poco X3 NFC (93/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Poco X3 NFC (95/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Poco X3 NFC (64/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Poco X3 NFC (68/100 vs 35/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Poco X3 NFC: The Poco X3 NFC is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Poco X3 NFC
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
AnTuTu 3379591 526647
Geekbench Single 3041 753
Geekbench Multi 9494 1808
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 1224x2992 2400x1080
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5160 mAh
Charging 68W 33W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 13 MP
Front camera 50 MP 20 MP
RAM 16GB 6GB
Storage 512GB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 16 Android 10
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 450 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP53
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 165.3×76.8×9.4 mm
Weight 199 g 215 g
Launch price $1499 $230
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Poco X3 NFC
  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 20MP
46
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display
Poco X3 NFC
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery
Poco X3 NFC
  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
49
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Poco X3 NFC, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3379591 AnTuTu
Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
47/100 -541.7%
526647 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Poco X3 NFC by 541.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
$1499
Poco X3 NFC
$230

Launch price difference: $1269. Poco X3 NFC was $1269 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Poco X3 NFC (93/100 vs 42/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Poco X3 NFC (95/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Poco X3 NFC (64/100 vs 49/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Poco X3 NFC (68/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Poco X3 NFC?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Poco X3 NFC by 31 points (78/100 vs 47/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Poco X3 NFC?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Poco X3 NFC — 47/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Poco X3 NFC?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 46/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Poco X3 NFC?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 42/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Poco X3 NFC?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco X3 NFC is a better fit for everyday use.