Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Nokia 3.4

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nokia 3.4 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 22/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 251,428); the Nokia 3.4 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 by 56 points (78/100 vs 22/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Performance 93
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 62
Nokia 3.4
Performance 18
Display 39
Camera 12
Battery 22
Portability 64
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 251428
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 272
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 992
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 18/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 12/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Nokia 3.4 better?
  • Lighter: 180g vs 199g

  • Overall rating 22/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Nokia 3.4, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 56 points higher (78/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (93/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (95/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (60/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (64/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nokia 3.4 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Nokia 3.4: The Nokia 3.4 is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Nokia 3.4
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
AnTuTu 3379591 251428
Geekbench Single 3041 272
Geekbench Multi 9494 992
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.4" IPS LCD
Resolution 1224x2992 720x1560
Refresh rate 165 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging 68W 10W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 5 MP
Front camera 50 MP 8 MP
RAM 16GB 3GB / 4GB
Storage 512GB 32GB / 64GB
OS Android 16 Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 161.0×76.0×8.7 mm
Weight 199 g 180 g
Launch price $1499
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Nokia 3.4
  • Main: 13MP
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 8MP
12
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display
Nokia 3.4
  • 6.4" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1560
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery
Nokia 3.4
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Nokia 3.4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3379591 AnTuTu
Nokia 3.4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
22/100 -1244.2%
251428 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Nokia 3.4 by 1244.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
$1499
Nokia 3.4
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (93/100 vs 18/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (95/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (60/100 vs 12/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (64/100 vs 22/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nokia 3.4 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nokia 3.4?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 by 56 points (78/100 vs 22/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nokia 3.4?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Nokia 3.4 — 22/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nokia 3.4?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 12/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nokia 3.4?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 18/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Nokia 3.4?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nokia 3.4 is a better fit for everyday use.