Motorola Razr Fold vs Nokia 3.4
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Nokia 3.4 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 22/100 (a 61-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 251,428); the Nokia 3.4 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Nokia 3.4
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 251428
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 272
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 992
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 18/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Nokia 3.4 better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 285g
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nokia 3.4, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 61 points higher (83/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (90/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (81/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (91/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (68/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.4 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nokia 3.4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 251428 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 272 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 992 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.4" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 720x1560 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 10W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 161.0×76.0×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 180 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia 3.4
- Main: 13MP
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 3.4
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Nokia 3.4
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nokia 3.4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nokia 3.4 by 1115.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 3.4
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (90/100 vs 18/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (81/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (91/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (68/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.4 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 by 61 points (83/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Nokia 3.4 — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 12/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 18/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.