Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Nokia 3.4
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nokia 3.4 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 22/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 251,428); the Nokia 3.4 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Nokia 3.4
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 251428
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 272
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 992
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 18/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Nokia 3.4 better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 199g
- Overall rating 22/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Nokia 3.4, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 55 points higher (77/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (60/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (91/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (95/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (60/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (61/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nokia 3.4 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Nokia 3.4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 251428 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 272 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 992 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.4" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 720x1560 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 10W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.0×76.0×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 180 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nokia 3.4
- Main: 13MP
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nokia 3.4
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Nokia 3.4
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Nokia 3.4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Nokia 3.4 by 1143.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 3.4
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (91/100 vs 18/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (95/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (60/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (61/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nokia 3.4 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 by 55 points (77/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nokia 3.4 — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 12/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 18/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Nokia 3.4?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.