Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Nokia 3.1 Plus
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nokia 3.1 Plus (2018) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 18/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 177,554); the Nokia 3.1 Plus is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Nokia 3.1 Plus
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3500 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Nokia 3.1 Plus better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 199g
- Better portability (69/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Nokia 3.1 Plus, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 60 points higher (78/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (95/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (64/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.1 Plus and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Nokia 3.1 Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 177554 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 723 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 8.1 (Oreo), planned upgrade to Android 9.0 (Pie); Android One | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 156.9×76.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 180 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- Main: 13MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- 3500 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Nokia 3.1 Plus, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Nokia 3.1 Plus by 1803.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (92/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (95/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (60/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (64/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.1 Plus and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus by 60 points (78/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Nokia 3.1 Plus — 18/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.