Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Nokia 3.1 Plus
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nokia 3.1 Plus (2018) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 18/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 177,554); the Nokia 3.1 Plus is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Nokia 3.1 Plus
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3500 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Nokia 3.1 Plus better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 199g
- Better portability (69/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Nokia 3.1 Plus, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 59 points higher (77/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (95/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (61/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.1 Plus and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Nokia 3.1 Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 177554 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 723 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 8.1 (Oreo), planned upgrade to Android 9.0 (Pie); Android One | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 156.9×76.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 180 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- Main: 13MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- 3500 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Nokia 3.1 Plus, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Nokia 3.1 Plus by 1660.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (91/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (95/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (60/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (61/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.1 Plus and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus by 59 points (77/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nokia 3.1 Plus — 18/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.