Motorola Razr Fold vs Nokia 3.1 Plus
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Nokia 3.1 Plus (2018) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 18/100 (a 65-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 177,554); the Nokia 3.1 Plus is noticeably lighter (180g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Nokia 3.1 Plus
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3500 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Nokia 3.1 Plus better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 285g
- Better portability (69/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nokia 3.1 Plus, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 65 points higher (83/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (90/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (81/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (68/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.1 Plus notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (69/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nokia 3.1 Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 177554 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 723 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 8.1 (Oreo), planned upgrade to Android 9.0 (Pie); Android One | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 156.9×76.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 180 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- Main: 13MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- 3500 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nokia 3.1 Plus, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nokia 3.1 Plus by 1621.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (90/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (81/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (91/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (68/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.1 Plus notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (69/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus by 65 points (83/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Nokia 3.1 Plus — 18/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nokia 3.1 Plus?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.