Motorola Razr Fold vs Redmi 3S
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Redmi 3S (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430; launch prices were $1799 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 21/100 (a 62-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 180,440); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 3S doesn't; the Redmi 3S is noticeably lighter (144g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Redmi 3S
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 180440
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 827
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4100 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 11/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 35/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Redmi 3S better?
- Lighter: 144g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $120 vs $1799
- Better portability (78/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Redmi 3S, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 62 points higher (83/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Redmi 3S — 24/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (90/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (68/100 vs 35/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 3S notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (78/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Redmi 3S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 180440 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 827 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 5.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4100 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 2GB / 3GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 139.3×69.6×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 144 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $120 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi 3S
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 3S
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Redmi 3S
- 4100 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Redmi 3S, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Redmi 3S by 1594.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1679. Redmi 3S was $1679 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (90/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (81/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (91/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (68/100 vs 35/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi 3S notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (78/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S by 62 points (83/100 vs 21/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Redmi 3S — 21/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.