Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Redmi 3S
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Redmi 3S (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430; launch prices were $1499 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 21/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 180,440); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 3S doesn't; the Redmi 3S is noticeably lighter (144g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Redmi 3S
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 180440
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 827
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4100 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 11/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 35/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Redmi 3S better?
- Lighter: 144g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $120 vs $1499
- Better portability (78/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Redmi 3S, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 57 points higher (78/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Redmi 3S — 24/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (92/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (95/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (64/100 vs 35/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 3S is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Redmi 3S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 180440 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 827 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 5.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4100 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 2GB / 3GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 139.3×69.6×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 144 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $120 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi 3S
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Redmi 3S
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Redmi 3S
- 4100 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Redmi 3S, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Redmi 3S by 1773.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1379. Redmi 3S was $1379 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (92/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (95/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (60/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (64/100 vs 35/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi 3S is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S by 57 points (78/100 vs 21/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Redmi 3S — 21/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Redmi 3S?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.