Motorola Razr Fold vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $1799 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 71/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,726,802); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is noticeably lighter (219g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2726802
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 8932
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 45/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Lighter: 219g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 12 points higher (83/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (91/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 2726802 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 8932 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $300 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Redmi Turbo 5 Max by 12.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1499. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $1499 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (91/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.