Motorola Razr Fold vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $1799 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 71/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,100,039 vs 3,057,215); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is noticeably lighter (219g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 8932
- Better camera (91/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 45/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3100039 vs 3057215
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Lighter: 219g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 12 points higher (83/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100. In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (91/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3100039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 8932 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $300 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Motorola Razr Fold by 1.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1499. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $1499 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (91/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.