Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $1299 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 leads — 77/100 vs 71/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,728,128).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 Max by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 60
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Performance 88
Display 84
Camera 37
Battery 80
Portability 54
Value for money 84
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2728128
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2680
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 8358
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Cheaper: $300 vs $1299

  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 62/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 scores 6 points higher (77/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 leads (60/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (84/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 88/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (60/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (84/100 vs 62/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max: The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 3119308 2728128
Geekbench Single 3041 2680
Geekbench Multi 9494 8358
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 2772x1280
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 9000 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Front camera 50 MP 20 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm
Weight 199 g
Price $1299 $300
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
77/100
3119308 AnTuTu
Redmi Turbo 5 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
71/100 -14.3%
2728128 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 leads Redmi Turbo 5 Max by 14.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
$1299
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
$300

Price difference: $999. Redmi Turbo 5 Max is cheaper by $999.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 88/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (60/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (80/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (84/100 vs 62/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 Max by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 37/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.