Motorola Razr Fold vs Oscal Flat 3C Mini
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (2026) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 16/100 (a 67-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 5 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 153,667); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini doesn't; the Oscal Flat 3C Mini is noticeably lighter (158g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 846
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 31/100)
What makes Oscal Flat 3C Mini better?
- Lighter: 158g vs 285g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Oscal Flat 3C Mini, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 67 points higher (83/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (90/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (68/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (68/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Oscal Flat 3C Mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 846 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 5.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 480x854 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 10W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 Go | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 135.6×70.2×11.1 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 158 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x854
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Oscal Flat 3C Mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 1889.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (90/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (81/100 vs 31/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (91/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (68/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (68/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 67 points (83/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.