Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Oscal Flat 3C Mini
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (2026) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 16/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 5 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 153,667); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini doesn't; the Oscal Flat 3C Mini is noticeably lighter (158g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 846
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 31/100)
What makes Oscal Flat 3C Mini better?
- Lighter: 158g vs 199g
- Overall rating 16/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Oscal Flat 3C Mini, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 60 points higher (76/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (91/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (94/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (58/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Oscal Flat 3C Mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 846 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 5.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 480x854 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 10W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 Go | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 135.6×70.2×11.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 158 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x854
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Oscal Flat 3C Mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 1827.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (91/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (94/100 vs 31/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (57/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (58/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 60 points (76/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.