Motorola Razr Fold vs OPPO Reno16
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the OPPO Reno16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4; launch prices were $1799 and $470. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 74/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,078,850); the OPPO Reno16 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
OPPO Reno16
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2078850
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1270
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 4106
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 66/100)
What makes OPPO Reno16 better?
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Lighter: 188g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $470 vs $1799
- Better display (85/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the OPPO Reno16, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 9 points higher (83/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 81/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, OPPO Reno16 — 72/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (90/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | OPPO Reno16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 2078850 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1270 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 4106 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.3" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6700 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $470 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno16
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
OPPO Reno16
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and OPPO Reno16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads OPPO Reno16 by 47.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1329. OPPO Reno16 was $1329 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (90/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno16?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the OPPO Reno16 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the OPPO Reno16 — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno16?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno16?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the OPPO Reno16?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The OPPO Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.