Oppo Reno16 vs Realme 16 Pro+
The Oppo Reno16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the Realme 16 Pro+ (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno16 leads — 72/100 vs 68/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Realme 16 Pro+ has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6700); the Realme 16 Pro+ is faster in AnTuTu (1,392,392 vs 1,282,176).
Oppo Reno16
Realme 16 Pro+
- Lighter: 188g vs 199g
- Better camera (81/100 vs 58/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 60/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1392392 vs 1282176
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6700 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (66/100 vs 65/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno16 vs the Realme 16 Pro+, the Oppo Reno16 scores 4 points higher (72/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme 16 Pro+ and the Oppo Reno16 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Realme 16 Pro+ is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 notably outperforms the Realme 16 Pro+ (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme 16 Pro+ and the Oppo Reno16 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 and the Realme 16 Pro+ are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno16 | Realme 16 Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1282176 | 1392392 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1270 | 1270 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4106 | 4106 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | $330 |
Oppo Reno16
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Realme 16 Pro+
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno16
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme 16 Pro+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno16
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Realme 16 Pro+
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno16 and Realme 16 Pro+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme 16 Pro+ leads Oppo Reno16 by 7.9% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Reno16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Realme 16 Pro+ and the Oppo Reno16 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme 16 Pro+ is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 notably outperforms the Realme 16 Pro+ (81/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme 16 Pro+ and the Oppo Reno16 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 and the Realme 16 Pro+ are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno16 or the Realme 16 Pro+?
The Oppo Reno16 edges out the Realme 16 Pro+ by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno16 and the Realme 16 Pro+?
The Oppo Reno16 has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Realme 16 Pro+ — 68/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno16 or the Realme 16 Pro+?
The Oppo Reno16 leads on camera score (81/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno16 over the Realme 16 Pro+?
The Oppo Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Realme 16 Pro+ is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.