Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs Oppo Reno16
The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the Oppo Reno16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno16 leads — 72/100 vs 68/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno16 has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5200); the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,405,881 vs 1,282,176).
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Oppo Reno16
- Higher AnTuTu: 1405881 vs 1282176
- Higher performance (66/100 vs 65/100)
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 50W
- Lighter: 188g vs 195g
- Better camera (81/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 62/100)
Comparing the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs the Oppo Reno16, the Oppo Reno16 scores 4 points higher (72/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 leads (66/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro and the Oppo Reno16 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno16 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (64/100 vs 62/100).
| Specification | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | Oppo Reno16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1405881 | 1282176 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1270 | 1270 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4106 | 4106 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.3" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2412x1080 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6700 mAh | |
| Charging | 50W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×76.6×8.0 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $449 | — |
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno16
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2412x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno16
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno16
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nothing Phone (4a) Pro and Oppo Reno16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro leads Oppo Reno16 by 9.6% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Reno16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro and the Oppo Reno16 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno16 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (64/100 vs 62/100).
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro or the Oppo Reno16?
The Oppo Reno16 edges out the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro and the Oppo Reno16?
The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Oppo Reno16 — 72/100.
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro over the Oppo Reno16?
The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is a better fit for active users. The Oppo Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.