Motorola Razr Fold vs OPPO Reno16 Pro
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super; launch prices were $1799 and $600. Both devices score the same overall rating of 83/100. Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 3,057,215); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
OPPO Reno16 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 6405
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 66/100)
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 3057215
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1799
- Better camera (94/100 vs 91/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
The Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 83/100. Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | OPPO Reno16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1555 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 6405 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.3" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6700 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $600 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and OPPO Reno16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Motorola Razr Fold by 0.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1199. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $1199 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
Both devices scored 83/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Motorola Razr Fold (90/100 vs 82/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro — 83/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.