Motorola Razr Fold vs OPPO Reno16 F
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the OPPO Reno16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy; launch prices were $1799 and $480. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 63/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 879,714); the OPPO Reno16 F is noticeably lighter (194g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
OPPO Reno16 F
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 2813
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
What makes OPPO Reno16 F better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Lighter: 194g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $480 vs $1799
- Better portability (58/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the OPPO Reno16 F, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 20 points higher (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, OPPO Reno16 F — 48/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 F are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100. In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 F is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | OPPO Reno16 F | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $480 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno16 F
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
OPPO Reno16 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and OPPO Reno16 F, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads OPPO Reno16 F by 247.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1319. OPPO Reno16 F was $1319 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (90/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 F are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (91/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 F is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F by 20 points (83/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the OPPO Reno16 F — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the OPPO Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.