Motorola Razr Fold vs Oppo Reno16 F
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Oppo Reno16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 63/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno16 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 877,641); the Oppo Reno16 F is noticeably lighter (195g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Oppo Reno16 F
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 195g vs 285g
- Better portability (57/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Oppo Reno16 F, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 23 points higher (86/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 F (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Oppo Reno16 F are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 F (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Oppo Reno16 F are nearly equal (71/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 F is a bit better (57/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Oppo Reno16 F | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno16 F
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno16 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Oppo Reno16 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Oppo Reno16 F, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Oppo Reno16 F by 349.3% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Reno16 F
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 F (98/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Oppo Reno16 F are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 F (91/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Oppo Reno16 F are nearly equal (71/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 F is a bit better (57/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Oppo Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 F by 23 points (86/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Oppo Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Oppo Reno16 F — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Oppo Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Oppo Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Oppo Reno16 F?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Oppo Reno16 F is a better fit for everyday use.