Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Oppo Reno16 F

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Oppo Reno16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 63/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno16 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 877,641); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno16 F — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 64
Oppo Reno16 F
Performance 55
Display 80
Camera 64
Battery 68
Portability 57
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2813
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 57/100)
What makes Oppo Reno16 F better?
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
  • Lighter: 195g vs 199g

  • Better camera (64/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Oppo Reno16 F, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 13 points higher (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 F leads (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 F (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 F is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 F is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Oppo Reno16 F: The Oppo Reno16 F is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Oppo Reno16 F
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 7300
AnTuTu 3113462 877641
Geekbench Single 3041 1011
Geekbench Multi 9494 2813
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1080x2372
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 68W 80W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 16, ColorOS 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 1400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm
Weight 199 g 195 g
Launch price $1099
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Oppo Reno16 F
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Oppo Reno16 F
  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2372
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Oppo Reno16 F
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Oppo Reno16 F, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3113462 AnTuTu
Oppo Reno16 F MediaTek Dimensity 7300
63/100 -254.8%
877641 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Oppo Reno16 F by 254.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1099
Oppo Reno16 F
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 F (92/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 F is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 F is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Oppo Reno16 F?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno16 F — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Oppo Reno16 F?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Oppo Reno16 F — 63/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Oppo Reno16 F?

The Oppo Reno16 F leads on camera score (64/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Oppo Reno16 F?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Oppo Reno16 F?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Oppo Reno16 F is a better fit for everyday use.