Motorola Razr Fold vs OPPO Reno 16 FS
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy; launch prices were $1799 and $549. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 84/100 vs 61/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 FS has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,068,952 vs 877,641); the OPPO Reno 16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Higher AnTuTu: 3068952 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 2903 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9602 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 194g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $549 vs $1799
- Better portability (58/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the OPPO Reno 16 FS, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 23 points higher (84/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 72/100, OPPO Reno 16 FS — 42/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 FS are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (71/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | OPPO Reno 16 FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | 3068952 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2903 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9602 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $549 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and OPPO Reno 16 FS, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads OPPO Reno 16 FS by 249.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1250. OPPO Reno 16 FS was $1250 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (91/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 FS are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (91/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (71/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS by 23 points (84/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the OPPO Reno 16 FS — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (91/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use.