Motorola Razr Fold vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $1799 and $661. Both devices score the same overall rating of 86/100. Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,079,298); the Motorola Razr Fold is thinner (4.7mm vs 8.2mm).
Motorola Razr Fold
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 8358
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 89/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper: $661 vs $1799
- Better camera (94/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 76/100)
The Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 86/100. In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 8358 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | — | |
| Price | $1799 | $661 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads OPPO Reno 16 Pro by 28.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1138. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $1138.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (83/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
Both devices scored 86/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Motorola Razr Fold.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.