Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $1099 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 76/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 3,079,298).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 8358
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Cheaper: $661 vs $1099
- Better camera (94/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 58/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 10 points higher (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 8358 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | $1099 | $661 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads OPPO Reno 16 Pro by 1.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $438. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $438.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (83/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.