Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs OPPO Reno 16 FS
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy; launch prices were $1499 and $549. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 61/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 FS has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 877,641); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 58/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 194g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $549 vs $1499
- Better camera (64/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the OPPO Reno 16 FS, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 17 points higher (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 55/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, OPPO Reno 16 FS — 42/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (95/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | OPPO Reno 16 FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2813 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $549 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and OPPO Reno 16 FS, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads OPPO Reno 16 FS by 285.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $950. OPPO Reno 16 FS was $950 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (93/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (95/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the OPPO Reno 16 FS — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the OPPO Reno 16 FS — 61/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use.