Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2200; launch prices were $1099 and $1199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 67/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,434,169); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 228g).

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Performance 98
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 61
Portability 68
Value for money 72
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
Performance 68
Display 88
Camera 69
Battery 56
Portability 33
Value for money 44
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1434169
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1588
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3958
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 228g
  • Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 68/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 33/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra better?
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (69/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 13 points higher (80/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (98/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra — 44/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (98/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better (69/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (68/100 vs 33/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Samsung Exynos 2200
AnTuTu 3942923 1434169
Geekbench Single 3640 1588
Geekbench Multi 11033 3958
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 3088x1440
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 45W
Wireless charging 15W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 135
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 50 MP 40 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 12
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 1750 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 163.3×77.9×8.9 mm
Weight 199 g 228 g
Launch price $1099 $1199
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
  • Main: 108MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 40MP
69
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3088x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
61
battery
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
80/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Samsung Exynos 2200
67/100 -174.9%
1434169 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra by 174.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
$1099
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
$1199

Launch price difference: $100. Motorola Razr 70 Ultra was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (98/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better (69/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (68/100 vs 33/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra — 67/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra leads on camera score (69/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better fit for active users.