Motorola Signature vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2200; launch prices were $699 and $1199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 89/100 vs 67/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,434,169); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Signature has the stronger camera (164 vs 135); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 228g).
Motorola Signature
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1434169
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1588
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3958
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 186g vs 228g
- Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $1199
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 33/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, the Motorola Signature scores 22 points higher (89/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature leads (98/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (77/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Motorola Signature — 90/100, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra — 44/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (98/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (77/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (78/100 vs 33/100).
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 1434169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1588 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 3958 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 3088x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 135 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 40 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1750 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 163.3×77.9×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 228 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | $1199 |
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 40MP
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Signature and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra by 174.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Motorola Signature was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (98/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (91/100 vs 69/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (77/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (78/100 vs 33/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra by 22 points (89/100 vs 67/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra — 67/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 69/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (98/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better fit for active users.