Motorola Moto G (2022) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

The Motorola Moto G (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 42/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G (2022) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 515,647); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto G (2022) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 9.4mm).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) by 33 points (75/100 vs 42/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G (2022)

Performance 40
Display 44
Camera 31
Battery 66
Portability 42
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

What makes Motorola Moto G (2022) better?

  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Lighter: 204g vs 215g

  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 515647
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 690
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 1736
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (78/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 42/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G (2022) vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 33 points higher (75/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G (2022) leads (66/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) (76/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G (2022) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (66/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) (66/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G (2022) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 700 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 515647 3065623
Geekbench Single 690 2910
Geekbench Multi 1736 9174
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1600 2184x1968
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging — 25W
Wireless charging — 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 145
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 13 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) — 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP48
Dimensions 165.4×75.8×9.4 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 204 g 215 g
Launch price — $1999

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G (2022)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G (2022)

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G (2022)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G (2022) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G (2022) MediaTek Dimensity 700
42/100
515647 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100 +83.2%
3065623 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Motorola Moto G (2022) by 83.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto G (2022)

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) (91/100 vs 40/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) (78/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) (76/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G (2022) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (66/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) (66/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G (2022) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2022) by 33 points (75/100 vs 42/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Motorola Moto G (2022) has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G (2022) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G (2022) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G (2022) over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.