Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A03
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) and the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 43/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A03 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 doesn't; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.1mm).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (57/100 vs 29/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 196g vs 199g
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A03, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 33 points higher (76/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (57/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (68/100 vs 50/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | — | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | — | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.5" PLS TFT | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 196 g | |
| Price | $1099 | — |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 6.5" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy A03
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (94/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (57/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (68/100 vs 50/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 by 33 points (76/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 — 43/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A03 is a better fit for everyday use.