Motorola One Macro vs ZTE Axon 11 4G
The Motorola One Macro (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70, while the ZTE Axon 11 4G (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 11 4G leads — 38/100 vs 22/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 48 MP; the ZTE Axon 11 4G is noticeably lighter (168g vs 186g).
Motorola One Macro
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- Overall rating 22/100
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 168g vs 186g
- Better camera (36/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (32/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Motorola One Macro vs the ZTE Axon 11 4G, the ZTE Axon 11 4G scores 16 points higher (38/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G leads (36/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G leads (32/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G significantly outperforms the Motorola One Macro (82/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G notably outperforms the Motorola One Macro (36/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G is a bit better (32/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G notably outperforms the Motorola One Macro (80/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Motorola One Macro | ZTE Axon 11 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek Helio P70 | |
| AnTuTu | 303398 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 341 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 779 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.2" IPS LCD | 6.5" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1520 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10, MiFavor 10 | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.6×75.4×9.0 mm | 159.2×73.4×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 168 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Motorola One Macro
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Motorola One Macro
- 6.2" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1520
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Motorola One Macro
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Motorola One Macro and ZTE Axon 11 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G significantly outperforms the Motorola One Macro (82/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G notably outperforms the Motorola One Macro (36/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G is a bit better (32/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G notably outperforms the Motorola One Macro (80/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Motorola One Macro or the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The ZTE Axon 11 4G is noticeably better than the Motorola One Macro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola One Macro and the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The Motorola One Macro has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the ZTE Axon 11 4G — 38/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola One Macro or the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The ZTE Axon 11 4G leads on camera score (36/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola One Macro over the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The Motorola One Macro is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 11 4G is a better fit for everyday use.