Motorola One Macro vs Oppo Reno2 F
The Motorola One Macro (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70, while the Oppo Reno2 F (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno2 F leads — 34/100 vs 22/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 48 MP.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola One Macro
Oppo Reno2 F
What makes Motorola One Macro better?
- Lighter: 186g vs 195g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Oppo Reno2 F better?
- Faster charging: 20W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (34/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola One Macro vs the Oppo Reno2 F, the Oppo Reno2 F scores 12 points higher (34/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno2 F leads (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno2 F significantly outperforms the Motorola One Macro (82/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno2 F notably outperforms the Motorola One Macro (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 22/100. In the "portability" category, the Motorola One Macro and the Oppo Reno2 F are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola One Macro | Oppo Reno2 F | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek Helio P70 | |
| AnTuTu | 303398 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 341 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 779 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.2" IPS LCD | 6.5" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1520 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 20W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie); ColorOS 6.1 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 157.6×75.4×9.0 mm | 162.4×75.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola One Macro
- Main: 13MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Oppo Reno2 F
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Motorola One Macro
- 6.2" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1520
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo Reno2 F
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola One Macro
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno2 F
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola One Macro and Oppo Reno2 F, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno2 F significantly outperforms the Motorola One Macro (82/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno2 F notably outperforms the Motorola One Macro (34/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 22/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola One Macro and the Oppo Reno2 F are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola One Macro or the Oppo Reno2 F?
The Oppo Reno2 F is noticeably better than the Motorola One Macro — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola One Macro and the Oppo Reno2 F?
The Motorola One Macro has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Oppo Reno2 F — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola One Macro or the Oppo Reno2 F?
The Oppo Reno2 F leads on camera score (34/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola One Macro over the Oppo Reno2 F?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Oppo Reno2 F (82/100 vs 39/100).