Motorola One Macro vs ZTE Blade 20
The Motorola One Macro (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70, while the ZTE Blade 20 (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade 20 leads — 27/100 vs 22/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade 20 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 16 MP.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola One Macro
ZTE Blade 20
What makes Motorola One Macro better?
- Lighter: 186g vs 190g
- Better display (39/100 vs 38/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 54/100)
What makes ZTE Blade 20 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 18W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 16MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (15/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 22/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola One Macro vs the ZTE Blade 20, the ZTE Blade 20 scores 5 points higher (27/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade 20 leads (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola One Macro and the ZTE Blade 20 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade 20 is a bit better (15/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade 20 notably outperforms the Motorola One Macro (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola One Macro and the ZTE Blade 20 are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola One Macro | ZTE Blade 20 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek Helio P70 | |
| AnTuTu | 303398 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 341 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 779 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.2" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1520 | 720x1560 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 157.6×75.4×9.0 mm | 162.9×76.6×9.0 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola One Macro
- Main: 13MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade 20
- Main: 16MP f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola One Macro
- 6.2" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1520
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade 20
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola One Macro
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade 20
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola One Macro and ZTE Blade 20, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola One Macro and the ZTE Blade 20 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade 20 is a bit better (15/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade 20 notably outperforms the Motorola One Macro (43/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola One Macro and the ZTE Blade 20 are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola One Macro or the ZTE Blade 20?
The ZTE Blade 20 edges out the Motorola One Macro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola One Macro and the ZTE Blade 20?
The Motorola One Macro has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the ZTE Blade 20 — 27/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola One Macro or the ZTE Blade 20?
The ZTE Blade 20 leads on camera score (15/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola One Macro over the ZTE Blade 20?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the ZTE Blade 20 (43/100 vs 22/100).